You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 241 words from this article are provided below; about 484 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 88.1 | The History Cooperative
88.1  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
June, 2001
 
The Journal of American History

Table of contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 


Book Review




Battling for American Labor: Wobblies, Craft Workers, and the Making of the Union Movement. By Howard Kimeldorf. (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1999. x, 244 pp. Cloth, $45.00, ISBN 0-520-21832-9. Paper, $17.95, ISBN 0-520-21833-7.)

Through two case studies, Howard Kimeldorf challenges the classical analysis of American workers' preferences for either the American Federation of Labor (AFL) or the Industrial Workers of the World (IWW, the Wobblies) or, later, the Congress of Industrial Organizations (CIO). He suggests that those choices were more pragmatic than political and were linked to the necessary strategy to obtain control of the workplace. According to Kimeldorf, whether acting under AFL or IWW guidance, the workers were urged by a syndicalist spirit that had little to do with political choices. On the whole, rank-and-file workers were neither conservative nor revolutionary, but were seeking the most favorable way of improving their working conditions. 1
     By documenting the unchartered territory of the Philadelphia dock workers and that of the New York City hotel and restaurant workers from the 1900s to the 1930s, Kimeldorf sets a precise context for his larger theory on the workers' options for craft or industrial unionism. At the same time, this study also offers a way of bridging the wide chasm between the AFL's hegemony in labor relations at the time of World War I and the eventual coming of age of industrial unionism in the 1930s. . . .


There are about 484 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.