You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 128 words from this article are provided below; about 337 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 87.3 | The History Cooperative
87.3  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
December, 2000
 
The Journal of American History

Table of contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 


Book Review



Wings of Wood, Wings of Metal: Culture and Technical Choice in American Airplane Materials, 1914–1945. By Eric Schatzberg. (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1999. xvi, 313 pp. $49.50, ISBN 0-691-08773-3.)

To most historians an important component of the aeronautical "revolution" of the 1930s was the transition from the wooden, or "mixed" wood-and-metal, airplane to all-metal construction, more specifically the monocoque fuselage and the low cantilever wing. Engineers at the time thought this was a "natural" progression, and historians since have tended to regard the adoption of metal as predetermined. Eric Schatzberg examines this topic, asking: What "logic" led engineers to believe in the inevitability of metal construction? and, conversely, why did they dismiss wood as a material somehow unworthy for the construction of the "modern" airplane? . . .


There are about 337 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.