You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 208 words from this article are provided below; about 362 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 87.3 | The History Cooperative
87.3  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
December, 2000
 
The Journal of American History

Table of contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 


Book Review



William James on Consciousness beyond the Margin. By Eugene Taylor. (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996. xvi, 215 pp. $39.50, ISBN 0-691-01136-2.)

One cannot but admire Eugene Taylor's single-mindedness. He has used numerous forums, as he reminds us throughout, to argue that abnormal psychology is important in William James's thought because it provides the thread unifying the disparate aspects. In this book, he distinguishes two kinds of psychology: the psychophysics of Wilhelm Wundt and the Germans, and the psychopathology of Pierre Janet and the French. The former results in a sterile experimentalism, the latter, in rich, eclectic, person-centered theory. Standard histories of psychology identify psychology with the former, thereby depriving James of his proper place because it is his interest in psychopathology that forms the core of his contribution. 1
     Taylor's argument is that psychopathological concerns are present in James from the beginning of his work in the 1870s, that in The Principles of Psychology (1890) the German and the French sides are at war, and that later the French side wins. This leads James to abandon the more positivistic (antimetaphysical) stance of Principles and to work out his metaphysics of radical empiricism as the world view best suited to the needs of a person-centered psychology. . . .


There are about 362 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.