You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 199 words from this article are provided below; about 379 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 87.3 | The History Cooperative
87.3  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
December, 2000
 
The Journal of American History

Table of contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 


Book Review



Lies across America: What Our Historic Sites Get Wrong. By James W. Loewen. (New York: New Press, 1999. 471 pp. $26.95, ISBN 1-56584-344-4.)

James W. Loewen turns his curmudgeonly eye to the strategies Americans use to commemorate the nation's past—or some imagined version of it—on the varied memorial landscape. There are several amusing entries. A marker in Almo, Idaho, commemorates an Indian massacre that never took place. And there are monuments inspired by boosterism: towns boasting of being the birthplace of the first car, the first flight, the first use of ether. 1
     Our landscape tells many lies, Loewen argues, through silence (the failure of Scottsboro, Alabama, to recall the Scottsboro cases), omission (the use of the term "servant," not "slave," at many historic homes), sanitization (particularly at war museums), and overemphasis (the overwhelming memorial presence of governments, United States and Confederate, and in particular their wars). 2
     He calls attention to the importance of naming and renaming. For those contemptuous of Native American attempts to rename Devil's Lake, he argues, "If non-Native Americans no longer believe that Native religions are the devil's work, it is time to remove that implication from names all across America." . . .


There are about 379 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.