You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 215 words from this article are provided below; about 398 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 87.2 | The History Cooperative
87.2  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
September, 2000
 
The Journal of American History

Table of contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 


Book Review



A Young Man's Benefit: The Independent Order of Odd Fellows and Sickness Insurance in the United States and Canada, 1860–1929. By George Emery and J. C. Herbert Emery. (Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press, 1999. xx, 184 pp. $39.95, isbn 0-7735-1824-X.)

This book represents revisionism at its best. In just 150 pages, George Emery and J. C. Herbert Emery mount a devastating assault against the main pillars of fraternal historiography. 1
     As the largest fraternal order offering cash stipends to members in times of sickness, the Independent Order of Odd Fellows in North America (IOOF) serves as an ideal case study for this purpose. The benefit system it established reached its apogee in the 1890s but was slowly phased out beginning in the 1920s. 2
     Emery and Emery dispute the standard explanations for the demise of the IOOF's sick benefits. Through extensive primary sources, they demonstrate that the system was financially sound and rarely, if ever, brought insolvency. Although IOOF lodges did not always follow the recommended actuarial principles of insurance experts, they counterbalanced any losses by raising revenue from alternative sources, such as rents. In addition, they reduced moral hazard by monitoring sick claims through visiting committees. Contrary to the conventional wisdom, the aging of the membership did not pose an insurmountable threat. . . .


There are about 398 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.