You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 247 words from this article are provided below; about 408 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
Previews | The Journal of American History, 87.1 | The History Cooperative
87.1  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
June, 2000
Previous
Table of Contents
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of contents
List journal issues
Home
 


Previews



Walter Johnson writes about the stories that southern whites told themselves about race and slavery and about how one young enslaved woman employed those stories in a daring scheme to escape. Sold in the slave market in New Orleans, Alexina Morrison ran away and filed suit against her owner, claiming that she was a white person who had been wrongly enslaved. As her case made its way through the courts, it exposed tensions in the accounts of slavery that white southerners used to justify their social order—tensions over the balance between the prerogatives of slavery and those of nonslaveholding white patriarchy, over the place of white labor in a society founded on black slavery, over who was white and who was black and who had the power to say so.

United States history cannot be understood apart from Caribbean colonial history, Gervasio Luis García suggests. In the essay that won the oah Foreign-Language Article Prize for 1999, García studies the efforts of the United States to invent colonial relations with Cuba and Puerto Rico after the Hispanic/Cuban/American war of 1898. The outcome in Puerto Rico shows that colonies are the product not only of imperial impositions but also of complicities, of negotiations between the metropolis and the subalterns. Shared interests and attitudes—including a paternalistic stance toward most of the island's people—drew Puerto Rican elites and agents of the United States government together. Postmodernism's insistence on difference and exclusion clouds such similarities between conqueror and conquered.

. . .


There are about 408 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.