You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 194 words from this article are provided below; about 339 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 87.1 | The History Cooperative
Volume 87, Number 1  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
June, 2000
 
The Journal of American History

Table of contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 


Book Review




Buff Facings and Gilt Buttons: Staff and Headquarters Operations in the Army of Northern Virginia, 1861–1865. By J. Boone Bartholomees Jr. (Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 1998. xvi, 352 pp. $29.95, isbn 1-57003-220-3.)

Even the most dedicated readers of Civil War military history, whose focus is often either on the generals whose decisions shaped the outcome of battles or on the soldiers who fought them, are certain to be less familiar with the duties of the staff officers, without whom neither the generals nor the soldiers could have functioned properly. Military historians have long criticized Union and Confederate staffs for being less organized and structured than the general staffs of more modern European and American armies. J. Boone Bartholomees Jr., a military historian who is also a retired United States Army officer with extensive staff experience, argues that the typical Civil War staff—using the Army of Northern Virginia as a case study—performed as well as anyone could have expected at the time. Though most of Robert E. Lee's staff officers "had little or no military experience," he concludes, "they did what their commanders asked and generally did it very well." . . .


There are about 339 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.