You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 195 words from this article are provided below; about 390 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 87.1 | The History Cooperative
Volume 87, Number 1  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
June, 2000
 
The Journal of American History

Table of contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 


Book Review




History and the Christian Historian. Ed. by Ronald A. Wells. (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1998. vi, 248 pp. Paper, $23.00, isbn 0-8028-4536-3.)

Ronald A. Wells, in the volume's introduction, states that what ties the thirteen contributors together is the insistence that "our standpoint—that God exists 'in reality' and that we 'know' God through Jesus—has an impact on how we think about our historical tasks." That may be so, but it is difficult to tell from these essays just how. None of the authors, in talking either about teaching or about research, argues a perspective of triumphal Christianity. Only one of them suggests that historians consider supernatural providence as possibly having relevance to historical explanation. A contemporary Christian perspective is strongly disassociated from the narrowness that once passed for tolerance in American Protestant circles. This is all to the good, but it leaves the truth claims of Christianity without much historical work to do. In spite of themselves, the essayists, who include some of our best historians of American religion, bear out what only D. G. Hart states candidly: the "arguments for the difference that Christianity makes for historical scholarship" are not "fully convincing." . . .


There are about 390 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.