You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 248 words from this article are provided below; about 500 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
Previews | The Journal of American History, 86.4 | The History Cooperative
86.4  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
March, 2000
Previous
Table of Contents
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of contents
List journal issues
Home
 


Previews



In his presidential address to the Organization of American Historians, William H. Chafe challenges the traditional tendency to see the age of segregation as one of pure oppression and victimization. Chafe cites the daily acts of courage, resilience, and community building through which African Americans sought to maintain the dignity and integrity of their families, to create a better world for their children, and to find ways of moving forward—inch by inch—to achieve the chance of freedom. Based on interviews in ten states, the article suggests the rich texture of African American community and family life, even in this, "the nadir" of post-Civil War black experience.

The story that the British general Jeffery Amherst attempted to infect Native Americans with smallpox at Fort Pitt in 1763 has become a commonplace of American history. But is the story true? And, if the attempt was made, could it have worked? Was it an isolated incident? Elizabeth A. Fenn, whose essay won the Louis Pelzer Award for 1999, takes a new look at the evidence regarding smallpox transmission in eighteenth-century America. She shows that contemporary military ethics left ample room for acts of biological terror, that means of spreading smallpox were well known, and that accusations of deliberate smallpox infection arose frequently. If incidents of willful contagion were not common, they were probably not so rare as historians previously believed.

Current debates about religion in public schools often reflect misconceptions about the pervasiveness of religion in nineteenth-century schooling. . . .


There are about 500 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.