You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 228 words from this article are provided below; about 409 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
Book Review | The Journal of American History, 86.2 | The History Cooperative
86.2  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
September, 1999
 
The Journal of American History

Table of contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 


Book Review



Sorting Out the New South City: Race, Class, and Urban Development in Charlotte, 1875-1975. By Thomas W. Hanchett. (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1998. xvi, 380 pp. Cloth, $59.95, isbn 0-8078-2376-7. Paper, $24.95, isbn 0-8078-4677-5.)

Marshaling an impressive array of sources, rigorously analyzed, Thomas W. Hanchett tells a familiar story about a less familiar place. Charlotte, North Carolina, became increasingly segregated by race, class, and land usage over the century following Reconstruction. In a powerful thesis that well structures this chronological account, Hanchett argues that Charlotte evolved from a preindustrial "salt-and-pepper" city of intermingling peoples and purposes, to a "patchwork" of irregularly alternating black and white neighborhoods, to a partitioned metropolis of large homogenous "sectors" or quadrants. 1
     These transformations are vividly depicted in text and illustrations. Residences with "homey gable roof" and commercial establishments with "boxy, flat-topped form," once photographed side by side, came to occupy separate, ever more distant spaces, as railroads helped create a regional center of textile manufacturing, distribution, and banking. Removed from the core, neighborhoods were not predestined as enclaves, however. Charlotte's first streetcar suburb "bent or broke" all the rules; its designer envisioned a mixed-race, self-sufficient community of factories, stores, and houses. Yet after the failed Populist-Republican "Fusion" alliance, disfranchisement was encoded in law. Red-shirts paraded, and white preachers advocated race- and class-segregated communities, schools, and churches. . . .


There are about 409 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.