You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 221 words from this article are provided below; about 372 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
Book Review | The Journal of American History, 86.2 | The History Cooperative
86.2  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
September, 1999
 
The Journal of American History

Table of contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 


Book Review



Women, Gays, and the Constitution: The Grounds for Feminism and Gay Rights in Culture and Law. By David A. J. Richards. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998. xiv, 531 pp. Cloth, $65.00, isbn 0-226-71206-0. Paper, $22.00, isbn 0-226-71207-9.)

Before writing this book, the law scholar David A. J. Richards wondered whether antebellum reform movements had "interpretive relevance" for contemporary debates about "gender and sexual preference." He soon fastened upon "abolitionist feminism" as especially fertile ground. In his view, antebellum feminists "united common principles condemning slavery and racism and the subjection of women and sexism . . . [on] the platform of human rights" in order to eradicate "moral slavery." Having taken up a "theory and practice of rights-based feminism building on abolitionist feminism," reformers then pumped their reading of first principles into the Reconstruction amendments. Ominously, there emerged "suffrage feminism," with its racism, xenophobia, homophobia, and classism. But, says Richards, the anti-"moral slavery" vanguard resurged after World War II, permitting nationalization of the Bill of Rights, universal guarantees of equal protection of law, and "second wave" feminism's condemnation of injustice. Sections describing "abolitionist feminism" and "suffrage feminism" support an analysis of "Second Wave Feminism as Abolitionist Feminism," which in turn lays foundations for a discussion of gay rights, seen here as an extension of developments since the 1840s. . . .


There are about 372 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.