You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 140 words from this article are provided below; about 380 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
Book Review | The Journal of American History, 86.1 | The History Cooperative
86.1  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
June, 1999
 
The Journal of American History

Table of contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 


Book Review



The Encyclopedia of Native American Legal Tradition. Ed. by Bruce Elliott Johansen. (Westport: Greenwood, 1998. xii, 410 pp. $95.00, isbn 0-313-30167-0.)

It is amazing that no one had thought of compiling a layperson's sourcebook of federal Indian law and politics until the present time. For most of this century Indians at every level of knowledge and sophistication have been involved in federal and state legislation and litigation, yet there has been no single simple source from which to gather information. Felix S. Cohen's Handbook of Federal Indian Law (1992) provides good data on a variety of topics, but using it is not a casual task. Indeed, some topics are covered so intensely that the reader still does not know what the probable meaning of a legal doctrine is—or whether an idea is in fact a legal doctrine. . . .


There are about 380 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.