You have not been recognized as a subscriber to Indiana Magazine of History online. About 231 words from this article are provided below; about 447 words remain.
 
If you are a individual subscriber to Indiana Magazine of History, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a subscriber to Indiana Magazine of History, you can:
• subscribe here.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of Indiana Magazine of History.

Instititutions can:
• Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | Indiana Magazine of History, 103.3 | The History Cooperative
103.3  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
September, 2007
Previous
Next
Indiana Magazine of History

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 

Reviews

Danger on the Doorstep
Anti-Catholicism and American Print Culture in the Progressive Era

By Justin Nordstrom
(Notre Dame, Ind.: Notre Dame University Press, 2006. Pp. ix, 296. Illustrations, appendix, notes, index. Paperbound, $30.00.)


Justin Nordstrom's analysis of anti- Catholic popular publications during the Progressive Era views this expression of nativism as a part of the ruralurban conflict that punctuated the period. The city, and Catholics who resided there, represented strange peoples and customs, sexual licentiousness, and lack of simplicity. Nativists grafted their movement onto progressivism and, working on the principle of guilt by association, sought to make Catholics scapegoats for modernity. In the South, where Catholics were rare, as they were in most rural areas, such anti-Catholicism was particularly intense. 1
      Anti-Catholicism was an ultranationalist variation on the American propensity to believe in conspiracy theories. Most threatening to this frame of mind was the idea that Catholics vested ultimate authority in a hierarchy whose epicenter lay abroad. American distrust of centralized power in any form, whether governmental or religious, had deep roots in the nation's history, dating back to the colonial period. Protestants were troubled by the doctrine of papal infallibility, which seemed undemocratic. Yet most charges were not original, nor were they specific to North America or limited to the time. They were as old as the Protestant Reformation— and they remain today, separating Protestantism and Catholicism. . . .

There are about 447 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.