|
|
|
Review
|
Navigating World History: Historians Create a Global Past,
by Patrick Manning. New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2003. 384 pages,
$79.95 cloth, $26.95 paper.
|
|
The engines propelling the rapidly growing field of world history
are in certain respects above and below the instructors teaching
it: students want to know where their world of great diversity came
from, while administrators want to create "relevant" curricula.
Fortunately, compared to the vacuous "current events"
programs often foisted on K-12 schools or the myopically present-minded
requirements at some colleges and universities, well done world
history is both relevant and academically legitimate. Its growth,
however, has placed an extraordinary challenge on the instructors
and professors asked to do the teaching, few of whom have had real
training in it. For many, their best claim to being qualified is,
in addition to their general preparation to teach social studies
or history, one course, possibly many years ago, fulfilling a distribution
requirement for their history major or, if they went to graduate
school recently, an MA requirement or a doctoral "outside field"
on some region other than their specialization. In my experience,
instructors' reluctance to teach world history stems not from intellectual
aversion, but rather from the challenge of preparing for the task
(often without real institutional support). For this reason alone,
Navigating World History, is welcome: anyone feeling unprepared
to face students signed up for world history should read this book.
Because the volume is intellectually deep and thorough and addresses
issues relevant to the professions of history and education, it
also should be of use to any teacher, historian, or administrator
interested in the status of world history.
|
1
|
|
Navigating World History,
is not, thankfully, a compendium of factual information or a
rattling-off of strategies on how-to-get-it-all-done. Rather, stepping
back from the actual teaching of world history and the "facts"
thereof, Manning evaluates the field in five major sectionsits intellectual
origins, its connection to changes in the study of history itself,
recent research in world history, an examination of the logic of
world historical analysis, and finally, its place in the academy.
By examining world history in this broad context, Manning demystifies
it. Not across some impassable boundary, world history has many
points of contact with traditional historical studies. On the other
hand, by considering recent research, he also demonstrates how world
history enhances our understanding of the past. A major impetus
behind the field, Manning argues, is the explosion of knowledge
in recent decades, making much of the work characteristic of world
history: comparisons and connections. Comparison struggles with
both intellectual and practical problems. One major issue facing
comparative work is the degree to which comparison of "objects"
outside their historical and cultural contexts is valid. At the
practical level, problems stem from the unevenness of research.
How valid can comparisons be between heavily researched areas and
those still in the early stages of historical examination? These
good questions, yet to be sorted out satisfactorily, nonetheless
do not undermine the value of comparison, which echoes the commonplace
that if you want to know your own country, visit another. But even
more than comparison, world history is about "connection,"
which, Manning argues, "conveys the character of world historical
analysis better than any other term. It acknowledges locality and
uniqueness, yet also invokes broad patterns" (p. 378).
|
2
|
|
This volume will be of use to many,
especially students embarking on an advanced degree in world history,
instructors facing it for the first time, experienced world history
teachers and professors, historians interested in the field, and
administrators at any level considering a program in world history.
Recent studies on "conversion" (a subject that, because
it is also a program of cultural transmission, should interest world
historians) suggest that this word, laden with connotations of center
and periphery, conqueror and conquered, is much more of a conversation
than historians have traditionally assumed. One strength of Manning's
book is that he seems not out to "win converts" per se
but to engage his readers in conversation about an exciting new
field. Because he assumes a fairly high degree of knowledge about
the past and addresses many professional issues, the conversation
is mainly with professional historians and teachers. Manning did
not intend this book for undergraduates, who (except those considering
graduate work) would probably not find it of interest or much use.
Many others, though, will benefit enormously. Manning is highly
authoritative but hardly authoritarian, and this conversation, as
almost all good ones are, is stimulating, informative, and open.
|
3
|
| |
|
|
International School of Luxembourg
|
Robert A. Pierce
|
|
Content in the History Cooperative database is intended for personal, noncommercial use only. You may not reproduce, publish, distribute, transmit, participate in the transfer or sale of, modify, create derivative works from, display, or in any way exploit the History Cooperative database in whole or in part without the written permission of the copyright holder.
|