You have not been recognized as a subscriber to the AHR online. About 244 words from this article are provided below; about 601 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the American Historical Association, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time. AHA members can go to the AHA individual membership section to locate their member numbers.

If you are not a member of the American Historical Association, you can:
• Join the AHA and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the American Historical Review.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the American Historical Review (104.3-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the American Historical Review.

Instititutions can:
• Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The American Historical Review, 112.5 | The History Cooperative
112.5  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
December, 2007
Previous
Next
The American Historical Review

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Book Review

Canada and the United States



Andrew L. Slap. The Doom of Reconstruction: The Liberal Republicans in the Civil War Era. (Reconstructing America Series, number 12.) New York: Fordham University Press. Pp. xxv, 206. $70.00.

In this book Andrew L. Slap differentiates between the Liberal Republican Party, organized to challenge Ulysses S. Grant's re-election, and what he calls a liberal republican movement, a small cohort of editors, intellectuals, and politicians who sought to steer a wayward polity back to its republican moorings. Most historians dismiss these reformers as inept political amateurs, disappointed office seekers, and carping critics excluded from power by their own self-righteousness. This book offers a more sympathetic portrait. 1
      Slap joins a growing company of historians who take seriously the ideas and beliefs espoused by political actors. He concentrates on a core of twenty-three liberal republicans who organized meetings in the early 1870s and otherwise promoted reform. Included are well-known figures such as Carl Schurz, David Wells, and the Adamses, and more obscure participants such as Mahlon Sands and Johann B. Stallo. Slap focuses on their public speech and private communication and on pronouncements in such journals as E. L. Godkin's The Nation and Samuel Bowles's Springfield Republican. He argues that the central tenet these men espoused was republicanism. They revered civic virtue and selflessness, decried corruption, denounced tyranny and centralized power, and warned against the tendency to elevate party imperatives over the nation's welfare. . . .

There are about 601 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.