You have not been recognized as a subscriber to the AHR online. About 161 words from this article are provided below; about 609 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the American Historical Association, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time. AHA members can go to the AHA individual membership section to locate their member numbers.

If you are not a member of the American Historical Association, you can:
• Join the AHA and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the American Historical Review.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the American Historical Review (104.3-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the American Historical Review.

Instititutions can:
• Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The American Historical Review, 112.4 | The History Cooperative
112.4  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
October, 2007
Previous
Next
The American Historical Review

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Book Review

Canada and the United States



Adam I. P. Smith. No Party Now: Politics in the Civil War North. New York: Oxford University Press. 2006. Pp. x, 266. $55.00.

Adam I. P. Smith's book revisits the question raised by Eric McKittrick's influential essay forty years ago: what role did the two-party system play in the North's Civil War? In McKittrick's view, northern wartime dissent was channeled into the party system, offering the North an advantage the South did not share. Recently, historians have challenged that assessment: in The Union Divided: Party Conflict in the Civil War North (2002), for example, Mark E. Neely, Jr., identifies the ways in which Civil War partisanship in fact threatened the stability of the Union. Smith takes a different tack: examining the fiery electoral battles that marked the homefront over the course of the war, he describes the emergence of a wartime political discourse whose most distinctive characteristic was an antiparty partisanship. . . .

There are about 609 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.