You have not been recognized as a subscriber to the AHR online. About 182 words from this article are provided below; about 552 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the American Historical Association, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time. AHA members can go to the AHA individual membership section to locate their member numbers.

If you are not a member of the American Historical Association, you can:
• Join the AHA and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the American Historical Review.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the American Historical Review (104.3-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the American Historical Review.

Instititutions can:
• Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The American Historical Review, 112.4 | The History Cooperative
112.4  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
October, 2007
Previous
Next
The American Historical Review

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Book Review

Canada and the United States



Matthew Mason. Slavery and Politics in the Early American Republic. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press. 2006. Pp. xii, 339. $45.00.

Matthew Mason wants to refocus political debates during the early republic through the lens of slavery. In this book, he shows how debates over such seemingly tangential issues as the relief efforts that followed a devastating city-wide fire in Savannah, Georgia, in 1820 provoked sectional rancor, which, in turn, lead to attacks on and defenses of slavery (pp. 1–2). He also shows how the language of the antebellum debates over slavery mirrored these earlier debates, in which the participants on both sides relied on standard repertoires that had been developed during the years between the enactment of the slave-trade ban and the Missouri Compromise (p. 237). Mason would then have us look at the whole 1808–1861 period seamlessly, as a period where the fate of American slavery was continually debated, rather than disjointedly, as a series of crises over the institution that defined critical junctures between times of relative quiescence. . . .

There are about 552 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.