| Book Review | The American Historical Review, 112.2

You have not been recognized as a subscriber to the AHR online. About 230 words from this article are provided below; about 561 words remain.

If you are a individual member of the American Historical Association, you may:: • login here if you have already registered for online access.; • Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time. AHA members can go to the AHA individual membership section to locate their member numbers.
If you are not a member of the American Historical Association, you can:: • Join the AHA and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the American Historical Review.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the American Historical Review (104.3-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the American Historical Review.
Instititutions can:: • Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.

| Book Review | The American Historical Review, 112.2 | The History Cooperative

Book Review

Comparative/World

Larry G. Gerber. The Irony of State Intervention: American Industrial Relations Policy in Comparative Perspective, 1914–1939. DeKalb: Northern Illinois University Press. 2005. Pp. vii, 212. $40.00.

The "irony" in the title of Larry G. Gerber's stimulating book refers to the passage of the Wagner (National Labor Relations) Act of 1935. How did it happen, Gerber asks, that laissez-faire America opted for so intrusive a state intervention into its industrial relations regime? Such an action, Gerber adds, "would have been inconceivable during the same period in Britain," America's companion in "having a `weak state'" (p. 3). The comparative history that proceeds from these observations goes in two directions. On one axis Gerber posits three levels of industrial relations activity/policy: macro (national); meso (industrywide); and micro (firm or plant level). On a second, temporal axis he posits two nodes around which activity/policy cluster. One he calls, following Otto Kahn-Freund, "collectivist laissez faire," in which "the state is largely a referee between organized workers and employers who must still compete in the marketplace"; the other, in a variety of guises, corporatism, in which "organized interests cooperate with the state to produce outcomes designed to serve the public interest" (p. 8). The premise of Gerber's book is that this particular analytical frame, applied comparatively, will yield an answer to the remarkable divergence of national labor policies in 1935.

. . .

There are about 561 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.