You have not been recognized as a subscriber to the AHR online. About 284 words from this article are provided below; about 543 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the American Historical Association, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time. AHA members can go to the AHA individual membership section to locate their member numbers.

If you are not a member of the American Historical Association, you can:
• Join the AHA and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the American Historical Review.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the American Historical Review (104.3-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the American Historical Review.

Instititutions can:
• Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The American Historical Review, 112.2 | The History Cooperative
112.2  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
April, 2007
Previous
Next
The American Historical Review

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Book Review

Canada and the United States



Virgil W. Dean. An Opportunity Lost: The Truman Administration and the Farm Policy Debate. Columbia: University of Missouri Press. 2006. Pp. xv, 275. $39.95.

The United States emerged from World War II in rare form. Unlike other major combatants, America's industrial and agricultural infrastructure was unscathed and ready for expansion. Virgil W. Dean explores the tumultuous postwar struggle to craft a new national farm policy to fit the transformed countryside. Like other essential industries, American farms had received generous government assistance during the war to boost production. In the postwar era, farmers feared an agricultural depression with wartime farm supports slated to end in late 1948. 1
      The hub of this book is the legendary 1948 presidential election. During the campaign President Harry S. Truman attacked the Republican-led "Do Nothing" 80th Congress, charging it with putting "a pitchfork in the farmer's back" (p. 104). Truman's secretary of agriculture, Charles Brannan, fallaciously claimed the GOP would end the farm program that farmers had depended on since the early New Deal. Both Truman and Brannan interpreted the Democrats' winning of the White House and Capitol Hill that year as a mandate for extending liberal Fair Deal programs in postwar America. A farmer himself, Truman gave his secretary of agriculture free rein to create a new agricultural policy. In early 1949 Brannan proposed to substitute market price supports with direct income payments to farmers. His plan set ceilings on the amount a farmer could receive and limited the program to farmers who did not exceed a set production mark. The Brannan Plan was supposed to foster the "family-sized farm" while providing affordable food for American consumers. . . .

There are about 543 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.