You have not been recognized as a subscriber to the AHR online. About 231 words from this article are provided below; about 573 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the American Historical Association, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time. AHA members can go to the AHA individual membership section to locate their member numbers.

If you are not a member of the American Historical Association, you can:
• Join the AHA and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the American Historical Review.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the American Historical Review (104.3-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the American Historical Review.

Instititutions can:
• Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The American Historical Review, 112.1 | The History Cooperative
112.1  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
February, 2007
Previous
Next
The American Historical Review

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Book Review

Europe: Early Modern and Modern



Alan McDougall. Youth Politics in East Germany: The Free German Youth Movement 1946–1968. (Oxford Historical Monographs.) New York: Oxford University Press for Clarendon Press. 2004. Pp. xiv, 261. $99.00.

In writing the history of East Germany (GDR), scholars are often split between conveying the perspective of the political leadership and its totalitarian intentions on the one hand, and the history of GDR society, everyday life, and ordinary people on the other. In his study of youth politics in East Germany during the regime of Walter Ulbricht, Alan McDougall aims to combine both perspectives. He analyzes Herrschaft as a relationship shaped by actors on both sides, who communicate both directly and indirectly. The debate about how to write the history of the GDR, highly politicized, has recently been rekindled over the question of how to present GDR history in museums and in monuments. McDougall takes a clear stand: he criticizes totalitarian theory for confusing political intentions with practices and results, and, by focusing heavily on the state and its apparatus of repression, for ignoring society and its resistant and stubborn tendencies and the instrumental use that ordinary people make of politics. Political power was much more chaotic in practice than in theory, he argues, and repression less effective than the political leadership hoped for and than some historians still tend to believe. . . .

There are about 573 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.