You have not been recognized as a subscriber to the AHR online. About 275 words from this article are provided below; about 601 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the American Historical Association, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time. AHA members can go to the AHA individual membership section to locate their member numbers.

If you are not a member of the American Historical Association, you can:
• Join the AHA and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the American Historical Review.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the American Historical Review (104.3-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the American Historical Review.

Instititutions can:
• Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The American Historical Review, 111.5 | The History Cooperative
111.5  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
December, 2006
Previous
Next
The American Historical Review

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Book Review

Europe: Early Modern and Modern



Lowell J. Satre. Chocolate on Trial: Slavery, Politics, and the Ethics of Business. Athens, Ohio: Ohio University Press. 2005. Pp. xi, 308. Cloth $55.00, paper $24.95.

Cadbury has long been associated in Britain with ethics and progressive social policy, both because of the antislavery position associated with its Quaker founders and because of its model village of Bournville, which housed some company workers at the end of the nineteenth century in exemplary conditions. Lowell J. Satre challenges this image through a detailed examination of Cadbury's use of cocoa beans farmed by slaves in the Portuguese island colonies of São Tomé and Princípe off the coast of Angola between the years 1901 and 1909. 1
      Although Portugal had abolished slavery in all of its colonies by 1870, it allowed contract labor. Natives could sign agreements of their own free will by which they committed themselves to five years' labor at a set wage. Under this system by 1900 Angola shipped about 4,000 serviçais a year to São Tomé and Princípe to work on cocoa plantations. In reality, the workers were coerced, repatriation was all but impossible, and the death rate was as high as twelve percent. Cadbury, Satre shows, was one of the main customers for the crop farmed by this de facto slave labor. By 1900 Cadbury purchased forty-five percent of its cocoa beans from São Tomé. By 1907, long after the labor practices in the Portuguese colonies had come to light, Cadbury still imported 7.4 million pounds of cocoa beans from São Tomé, about thirteen percent of the island's total exports (p. 80). . . .

There are about 601 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.