| Book Review | The American Historical Review, 111.3

You have not been recognized as a subscriber to the AHR online. About 226 words from this article are provided below; about 521 words remain.

If you are a individual member of the American Historical Association, you may:: • login here if you have already registered for online access.; • Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time. AHA members can go to the AHA individual membership section to locate their member numbers.
If you are not a member of the American Historical Association, you can:: • Join the AHA and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the American Historical Review.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the American Historical Review (104.3-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the American Historical Review.
Instititutions can:: • Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.

| Book Review | The American Historical Review, 111.3 | The History Cooperative

Nan E. Woodruff. American Congo: The African American Freedom Struggle in the Delta. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. 2003. Pp. 282. $39.95.
This book tells a story of nearly constant conflict between African American workers and wealthy employers in the Mississippi River Delta areas of Arkansas and Mississippi from about 1900 through World War II. Investigating an impressive range of sources, Nan E. Woodruff details the ways those employers tried to keep workers numerous and to minimize wages and resistance and the various ways workers fought back.	1
The differences were slight between timber work and agricultural work and between work on establishments owned by the heirs of southern plantations and those owned by northern investors. All employers wanted to keep compensation low, and almost all were willing to use violence and to manipulate the legal and political systems. Nor were there great differences, with a few exceptions, between the policies the various employers wanted and the policies granted by the state and federal governments; barons of land and lumber advertised themselves as progressive entrepreneurs, and governments went along, sometimes ignoring oppression, sometimes supporting it. Woodruff details the various ways employers tried to keep their workers dependent and cheap by using debt peonage, relying on company stores, and evicting or firing workers who tried to organize.	. . .

There are about 521 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.