| Book Review | The American Historical Review, 111.1

You have not been recognized as a subscriber to the AHR online. About 271 words from this article are provided below; about 498 words remain.

If you are a individual member of the American Historical Association, you may:: • login here if you have already registered for online access.; • Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time. AHA members can go to the AHA individual membership section to locate their member numbers.
If you are not a member of the American Historical Association, you can:: • Join the AHA and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the American Historical Review.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the American Historical Review (104.3-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the American Historical Review.
Instititutions can:: • Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.

| Book Review | The American Historical Review, 111.1 | The History Cooperative

Book Review

Canada and the United States

David Wagner. The Poorhouse: America's Forgotten Institution. Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield. 2005. Pp. xi, 179. Cloth $60.00, paper $22.95.
The social control thesis, a child of 1960s' suspicions about elites and the purposes of their institutions, has held powerful sway over social welfare scholarship for more than a generation. The argument—that welfare institutions served to secure an orderly working class, regulate the labor force to the advantage of capitalists, and impose middle-class values on workers—has been challenged and refined, debated and bemoaned. But even after four decades, social welfare scholars still have to wrestle with the issue of social control.	1
David Wagner, who acknowledges the tutelage of Frances Fox Piven and Richard Cloward, is no exception. He dutifully surveys the past debates about social control and humanitarianism, grounds his project in this mix, and then tries to turn the discussion away from this dichotomous stranglehold. He challenges historians to compare the poorhouse of the past to the homeless shelter of the present (and finds current provision for the homeless poor to be inferior even to the dreaded poorhouse of old).mc Much of the subject matter in this book is familiar to social welfare historians. The origins of the almshouse, the debates over indoor versus outdoor relief, the attempts to remove certain categories of the poor (children, the insane) from the poorhouse, the professionalization of social work, and the twentieth-century demise of the almshouse are topics well known to the field and need not be described here. But within this familiar outline, Wagner offers up several very original ideas.	. . .

There are about 498 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.