| Book Review | The American Historical Review, 110.5

You have not been recognized as a subscriber to the AHR online. About 199 words from this article are provided below; about 547 words remain.

If you are a individual member of the American Historical Association, you may:: • login here if you have already registered for online access.; • Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time. AHA members can go to the AHA individual membership section to locate their member numbers.
If you are not a member of the American Historical Association, you can:: • Join the AHA and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the American Historical Review.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the American Historical Review (104.3-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the American Historical Review.
Instititutions can:: • Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.

| Book Review | The American Historical Review, 110.5 | The History Cooperative

Book Review

Canada and the United States

Sarah E. Gardner. Blood and Irony: Southern White Women's Narratives of the Civil War, 1861–1937. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press. 2004. Pp. x, 341. $39.95.

Literacy is a powerful weapon in war: when combatants utilize words to construct and disseminate meaning, they advocate a political vision, sway public opinion, and shape the historical record. The battle over interpretation—especially rendered through the written text—is as significant as the battle over human life, land, and resources. Sarah E. Gardner's study of southern white women's writing about the Civil War amply demonstrates the validity of these claims. More than anything else, Gardner's book shows how white southern women used private and public writing to fight for a white supremacist, patriarchal political order that they fervently believed should be the national model. "I am a totally unreconstructed Confederate," Caroline Gordon, one of the novelists Gardner discusses, told an audience in 1974. "I came to believe ... that the fact that we lost the Civil War was not only a disaster for the South but for the whole nation" (p. 262). Gordon's remarks indicate the pernicious resonance of the ideas Gardner uncovers.

. . .

There are about 547 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.