You have not been recognized as a subscriber to the AHR online. About 223 words from this article are provided below; about 634 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the American Historical Association, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time. AHA members can go to the AHA individual membership section to locate their member numbers.

If you are not a member of the American Historical Association, you can:
• Join the AHA and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the American Historical Review.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the American Historical Review (104.3-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the American Historical Review.

Instititutions can:
• Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The American Historical Review, 110.4 | The History Cooperative
110.4  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
October, 2005
Previous
Next
The American Historical Review

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Book Review

Canada and the United States



Andrew S. Trees. The Founding Fathers and the Politics of Character. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 2004. Pp. xvi, 208. $29.95.

Political life in the early American republic often looked more like a court without a king than the classical polities idealized by the founders. Instead of the eloquent Cicero or the incorruptible Cato, the new nation's capitols seemed to be populated by courtiers, poseurs, and political operators on par with the capitols of Europe. To the chagrin of the likes of Thomas Jefferson and John Adams, by 1800, calumny and the odious spirit of party seemed to have overtaken classical virtue as the defining traits of national politics. In this elegantly composed study, Andrew S. Trees explores four founders' efforts to reconcile this new, contentious political world with their classical ideals. But, following the lead of Joanne Freeman, Trees looks neither to ideology nor to the myriad policy imbroglios of the era to illuminate this dissonant moment in American politics. Instead, he focuses on a single aspect of the founders' premodern system of values: namely the notion of character, by which Trees seems to mean the exterior display of merit. It was to character, Trees argues, that the idealistic founders looked for a way through the cruel, often personal politics of the 1790s. . . .

There are about 634 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.