You have not been recognized as a subscriber to the AHR online. About 154 words from this article are provided below; about 555 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the American Historical Association, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time. AHA members can go to the AHA individual membership section to locate their member numbers.

If you are not a member of the American Historical Association, you can:
• Join the AHA and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the American Historical Review.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the American Historical Review (104.3-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the American Historical Review.

Instititutions can:
• Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The American Historical Review, 110.2 | The History Cooperative
110.2  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
April, 2005
Previous
Next
The American Historical Review

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Book Review

Methods/Theory



Alfred Hiatt. The Making of Medieval Forgeries: False Documents in Fifteenth-Century England. (The British Library Studies in Medieval Culture.) London: The British Library, and Buffalo, N.Y.: University of Toronto Press. 2004. Pp. xiv, 226. $60.00.

In the past decade and a half, a number of books have examined what might be called the "theory" of forgery, rethinking the practice rather than dismissing it, and provoking a fierce and as yet unresolved debate. The emphasis is now likely to shift toward focused studies concentrating on precise cultural moments to test the arguments of Anthony Grafton, Susan Stewart, K. K. Ruthven, and myself. Alfred Hiatt's monograph is a fine example of what we might hope for, an informed, carefully researched, and beautifully produced reassessment of four medieval forgeries: the archive of Crowland Abbey, the annals of the University of Cambridge, the chronicles of John Hardyng, and the "Donation of Constantine." . . .

There are about 555 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.