You have not been recognized as a subscriber to the AHR online. About 249 words from this article are provided below; about 568 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the American Historical Association, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time. AHA members can go to the AHA individual membership section to locate their member numbers.

If you are not a member of the American Historical Association, you can:
• Join the AHA and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the American Historical Review.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the American Historical Review (104.3-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the American Historical Review.

Instititutions can:
• Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The American Historical Review, 110.1 | The History Cooperative
110.1  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
February, 2005
Previous
Next
The American Historical Review

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Book Review

Methods and Theory



Sandra Rudnick Luft. Vico's Uncanny Humanism: Reading the New Science between Modern and Postmodern. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. 2003. Pp. xviii, 213. $45.00.

This book by Sandra Rudnick Luft, twenty years in the making (p. xvii), is a personal yet rigorous reading of Gianbattista Vico's New Science, put forth by a scholar who has clearly lived with (and, I think, loved) this text for a long time. Luft's interpretation seeks to recover the strangeness of the New Science, its "confrontational, dislocative tendencies" (p. 111), because these aspects of it can speak most powerfully to our current need for new models of being human. "Being subject as humanity," Luft quotes Martin Heidegger, "has not always been the sole possibility belonging to the essence of historical man" (p. 167). Luft's approach follows from her aim, and it is, appropriately, unhistorical. Against "efforts to place the work in the history of ideas" (p. ix), Luft ignores "the search for historical and eidetic influences" and reads Vico "interactively, hermeneutically, fragmentarily, as one holds conversations with strangers only to discover shared insights" (p. ix). This "alchemical" reading, enabled here by two other sets of texts, postmodernist critiques (especially Friedrich Nietzsche, Heidegger, and Jacques Derrida) and new interpretations of Genesis and the rabbinic tradition, reveals how Vico got outside of the most fundamental metaphysical assumptions of both Western philosophical thought and Christian theology to imagine a radically different way of being human in the world. . . .

There are about 568 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.