You have not been recognized as a subscriber to the AHR online. About 183 words from this article are provided below; about 571 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the American Historical Association, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time. AHA members can go to the AHA individual membership section to locate their member numbers.

If you are not a member of the American Historical Association, you can:
• Join the AHA and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the American Historical Review.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the American Historical Review (104.3-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the American Historical Review.

Instititutions can:
• Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The American Historical Review, 109.5 | The History Cooperative
109.5  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
December, 2004
Previous
Next
The American Historical Review

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Book Review

Canada and the United States



Andrew C. Rieser. The Chautauqua Moment: Protestants, Progressives, and the Culture of Modern Liberalism. (Religion and American Culture.) New York: Columbia University Press. 2003. Pp. xiii, 399. $37.50.

Institutional histories are necessary evils. By sifting through mind-numbing reams of official documents, reports, and personal histories, the scholar compiles a narrative preserving a valuable past but interesting only to a few insiders. Unless an interpretive framework can be constructed in which to place the institution, its history remains largely unread and unappreciated. The critic congratulates the historian for the monotonous and painstaking research but decries a lack of contextual significance. One cannot help but be reminded of the common phrase written on the undergraduate paper using primary research: so what? 1
      Andrew C. Rieser has transcended this common problem with flying colors. His history of the Chautauqua movement is solid research transformed into an inquiry into the development and definitions of culture and class in post-Civil War America. The author makes clear that his is not an institutional history but rather, social history. . . .

There are about 571 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.