You have not been recognized as a subscriber to the AHR online. About 154 words from this article are provided below; about 580 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the American Historical Association, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time. AHA members can go to the AHA individual membership section to locate their member numbers.

If you are not a member of the American Historical Association, you can:
• Join the AHA and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the American Historical Review.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the American Historical Review (104.3-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the American Historical Review.

Instititutions can:
• Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The American Historical Review, 109.4 | The History Cooperative
109.4  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
October, 2004
Previous
Next
The American Historical Review

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Book Review

Asia



Vivek Chibber. Locked in Place: State-Building and Late Industrialisation in India. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 2003. Pp. xx, 334. $39.50.

Two stories, both unilinear, are prevalent about independent India's economic policies: the fake socialism story and the heroic liberalization story. The first story runs as follows: economic planning in Jawaharlal Nehru's India was an eyewash, and, as was bound to happen, even the pretence of socialism has now been abandoned. The second story is this: economic deregulation in the 1990s freed India from "the license-permit Raj" of the Five Year Plans and has at length set it on the path to development. As far as I know, no one has yet effectively told a third possible story: that socialist planning and laissez-faire might have been the appropriate policies in their respective time slots and were realistically pursued as such by the policy makers of the 1950s and 1990s. . . .

There are about 580 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.