You have not been recognized as a subscriber to the AHR online. About 147 words from this article are provided below; about 560 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the American Historical Association, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time. AHA members can go to the AHA individual membership section to locate their member numbers.

If you are not a member of the American Historical Association, you can:
• Join the AHA and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the American Historical Review.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the American Historical Review (104.3-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the American Historical Review.

Instititutions can:
• Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The American Historical Review, 109.3 | The History Cooperative
109.3  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
June, 2004
Previous
Next
The American Historical Review

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Book Review

Canada and the United States



Guy Chet. Conquering the American Wilderness: The Triumph of European Warfare in the Colonial Northeast. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press. 2003. Pp. xviii, 207. Cloth $60.00, paper $18.95.

In an invigorating book, Guy Chet takes steady aim at the legendary portrayal of the prowess of American arms as entailing the rejection of hidebound European military doctrines in favor of a more mobile and tactically offensive style of war. Chet maintains that the colonial era saw not the eclipse but the vindication of European approaches based on combining aggressive strategies with careful and usually defensive battlefield tactics. In military affairs, "the colonies gravitated towards England's cultural and administrative sphere of influence" (p. 6). By contrast, the offensive tactics often favored by French and aboriginal forces were determined "by strategic and logistical weakness" (p. 139; emphasis in original). . . .

There are about 560 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.