You have not been recognized as a subscriber to the AHR online. About 209 words from this article are provided below; about 607 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the American Historical Association, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time. AHA members can go to the AHA individual membership section to locate their member numbers.

If you are not a member of the American Historical Association, you can:
• Join the AHA and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the American Historical Review.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the American Historical Review (104.3-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the American Historical Review.

Instititutions can:
• Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The American Historical Review, 109.2 | The History Cooperative
109.2  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
April, 2004
Previous
Next
The American Historical Review

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Book Review

Canada and the United States



Michael Willrich. City of Courts: Socializing Justice in Progressive Era Chicago. (Cambridge Historical Studies in American Law and Society.) New York: Cambridge University Press. 2003. Pp. xxxix, 332. Cloth $70.00, paper $25.00.

In his introduction to a forum on the Constitution in American life, Harry Scheiber lamented the cleavages between legal and constitutional history even as he applauded the latter's renaissance (Journal of American History 74 [Dec 1977]: 667, 669). Twenty-five years later, those cleavages still bedevil us; at my university American legal history and American constitutional history are separate courses. Yet as Michael Willrich's well-written study demonstrates, a new generation of legal historians has begun an assault on the divide. 1
      Willrich's study is a significant contribution to that project. Focused on the progressive reforms of Chicago's criminal court system, he ties those efforts into a larger story of constitutional theory, even as he situates the reforms in the Progressives' social agenda. In the process, he demonstrates that ideas like "socialized law," which asserted "that law purposefully reshaped society by directly addressing concrete problems of social life" (p. 98), were simultaneously theories designed to correct failings in society, and alternatives to errant constitutional doctrines (pp. 102–04). . . .

There are about 607 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.