| Book Review | The American Historical Review, 109.2

You have not been recognized as a subscriber to the AHR online. About 583 words from this article are provided below; about 443 words remain.

If you are a individual member of the American Historical Association, you may:: • login here if you have already registered for online access.; • Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time. AHA members can go to the AHA individual membership section to locate their member numbers.
If you are not a member of the American Historical Association, you can:: • Join the AHA and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the American Historical Review.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the American Historical Review (104.3-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the American Historical Review.
Instititutions can:: • Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.

| Book Review | The American Historical Review, 109.2 | The History Cooperative

Book Review

Asia

Suvir Kaul, editor. The Partitions of Memory: The Afterlife of the Division of India. Paperback edition. Bloomington: Indian University Press. 2002. Pp. xiv, 301. $21.95.
Since the 1990s, rising religious tensions between various communities in India have led to the reexamination of the partition of 1947. This edited volume fits within the emerging genre of partition history. Eight essays, six on India and two on Pakistan, examine diverse and multiple memories of various groups in the Indian subcontinent and their different and differing relationships with events and the process of partition. Each of the essays highlights a narrative of disruption. Within the limits of this framework, the essays focus on issues as diverse as methods of doing history outside the official archive; celebration and spectacle of communal festivals; national monuments and religious tensions; history and learning in Indian schools; violence and masculinity in literary writings; and the location of marginal and outcast groups within historical and community narratives of India and Pakistan. The common thread connecting the essays is easily lost in the details, but taken as a whole the volume raises a critical question: how do we read partition? The contributors remind us that the neat official history of partition that the state has created suppresses and silences the meandering and multiple memories and manifold narratives that are the stuff of people's partition experiences and urge us to think about the myriad partitions within the partition of 1947.	1
The book begins with Mumlika Banerjee's examination of the role of the Khudai Khidmatgar (KK), a Pakhtun group in the Northwest Frontier (in present-day Pakistan) in the freedom struggle. Their commitment to the Gandhian ethos of nonviolence and a united India made the KK an undesirable memory in postindependence Pakistan. Can their sacrifice and struggle for freedom be recovered and find a fitting place within the national history? Banerjee leaves us with deep doubts.	2
Joya Chatterjee examines the place of the Bengali refugees in the postpartition politics of India. Initially sidelined, neglected, and denied privileges, unlike the Punjabi refugees of West Pakistan, over time the Bengali refugees learned to organize and demand their rights. Chatterjee argues that the refugee experience led to awareness and a language of rights for all citizens articulated in the voice of the politicized Bengalis.	3
Dovetailing her essay is Ramnarayan Rawat's analysis of Dalit politics in the partition years and their demand for recognition and rights as a minority group, which they failed to achieve. As the author argues, Dalit politics reveals the true face of Indian democracy as no more than a majoritarian tyranny.	4
The next essay in the volume shifts from the colonial to the precolonial period. Sunil Kumar's study of a national monument called the Qutb complex probes the delicate issue of the interaction of the Indian state with its Muslim past. Kumar argues that although the Qutb is iconic of multiple memories and associations, today only one kind of remembering is allowed. The representation of Qutb as "the Might of Islam" reduces the Muslim presence into an occupying force, which, in turn, justifies communal tensions toward Muslims in postindependence India.	5
Richard Murphy analyzes the relationship between community identity and the festival of Basant or Spring in Pakistan. Although partition divided Muslim and Hindu space, celebration of the so-called Hindu festival of Basant in Pakistan, Murphy reminds us, testifies to the lived experiences of syncretism and disrupts the reality of partition.	. . .

There are about 443 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.