You have not been recognized as a subscriber to the AHR online. About 311 words from this article are provided below; about 611 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the American Historical Association, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time. AHA members can go to the AHA individual membership section to locate their member numbers.

If you are not a member of the American Historical Association, you can:
• Join the AHA and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the American Historical Review.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the American Historical Review (104.3-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the American Historical Review.

Instititutions can:
• Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The American Historical Review, 109.1 | The History Cooperative
109.1  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
February, 2004
Previous
Next
The American Historical Review

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Book Review

Canada and the United States



J. Mills Thornton III. Dividing Lines: Municipal Politics and the Struggle for Civil Rights in Montgomery, Birmingham, and Selma. Tascaloosa: University of Alabama Press. 2002. Pp. xi, 733. $59.95.

In the late 1970s, J. Mills Thornton III began work on a study of the Montgomery bus boycott. During his 1987–1988 fellowship year at Virginia's Carter G. Woodson Institute, however, he decided to expand his research to ask a broader question: why did civil rights direct-action campaigns emerge in Alabama cities like Montgomery, Birmingham, and Selma but not in somewhat comparable settings like Mobile, Alabama, Columbus, Georgia, or Meridian, Mississippi? The explanation, he ultimately concluded, lay in the complex relationship between local black communities and white-dominated municipal politics. 1
      Thornton's first book, a detailed study of pre-Civil War Alabama politics, reflected his conviction that politics can only be understood by carefully examining the process at the grass-roots level. In the case of the civil rights movement, he acknowledges the impact of national trends and developments in the 1940s, 1950s and 1960s, but he insists that examining the local context will help us better understand how black citizens of some, but not all, black communities in Alabama came to believe that the "reality all around them, that formed the very substance of their daily existence, was in fact capable of being changed" (p. 7). His method is to sketch out this arguments for his book in brief introduction and then to describe the inner workings of race and politics in a 121-page section on Montgomery, a 240-page history of events in Birmingham, and a third, 120-page chapter on Selma. These sections, in turn, are followed by an account of race relations in the three cities in the thirty-five years since Martin Luther King, Jr.'s death and a final chapter summarizing his conclusions. . . .

There are about 611 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.