You have not been recognized as a subscriber to the AHR online. About 210 words from this article are provided below; about 695 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the American Historical Association, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time. AHA members can go to the AHA individual membership section to locate their member numbers.

If you are not a member of the American Historical Association, you can:
• Join the AHA and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the American Historical Review.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the American Historical Review (104.3-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the American Historical Review.

Instititutions can:
• Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The American Historical Review, 109.1 | The History Cooperative
109.1  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
February, 2004
Previous
Next
The American Historical Review

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Book Review

Comparative/World



Monica L. Smith, editor. The Social Construction of Ancient Cities. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution. 2003. Pp. xiii, 320. $45.00.

The definition of urbanism and the recognition of cities in the past are likely to be always a source of contention. In the first chapter of this collection, editor Monica L. Smith tries valiantly to deal with the problem of definitions, set out the book's theme, and pull all the disparate essays together. The main weakness, common to many edited volumes, is lack of consistent focus across contributions, while the main strength is that the individual essays present interesting case studies. The intent was to focus on ordinary households and how social interactions produce the archaeological record of ancient cities. However, lack of a clear definition of urban means that many different types of social relations are covered, losing the focus on how these ancient cities are "social constructions." Moreover, some contributions are concerned with origins and others with the workings of already extant sites, making the individual essays very different in purpose and in how they look at social interactions. Urban is defined so broadly that it becomes a useless concept. This is a problem of comparative social science, not just of this volume. . . .

There are about 695 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.