You have not been recognized as a subscriber to the AHR online. About 140 words from this article are provided below; about 598 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the American Historical Association, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time. AHA members can go to the AHA individual membership section to locate their member numbers.

If you are not a member of the American Historical Association, you can:
• Join the AHA and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the American Historical Review.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the American Historical Review (104.3-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the American Historical Review.

Instititutions can:
• Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The American Historical Review, 109.1 | The History Cooperative
109.1  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
February, 2004
Previous
Next
The American Historical Review

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Book Review

Canada and the United States



David J. Siemers. Ratifying the Republic: Antifederalists and Federalists in Constitutional Time. Stanford: Stanford University Press. 2002. Pp. xvii, 292. $55.00.

If the life of a constitution were measured in decades, not years, the American Constitution of 1787 would just have attained its majority. In retrospect, it seems remarkable that the infant survived its perilous first year of "constitutional time," the tumultuous decade of the 1790s. Early disagreements over domestic and foreign policy quickly escalated into disputes over the proper meaning of the constitutional text, demonstrating that for Americans constitutional interpretation was simply a continuation of politics by other means. For the Constitution, the "terrible twos" came precociously early, as the organization of political parties and the bitterly contested election of 1800 released surprisingly deep passions in the body politic. . . .

There are about 598 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.