You have not been recognized as a subscriber to the AHR online. About 190 words from this article are provided below; about 652 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the American Historical Association, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time. AHA members can go to the AHA individual membership section to locate their member numbers.

If you are not a member of the American Historical Association, you can:
• Join the AHA and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the American Historical Review.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the American Historical Review (104.3-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the American Historical Review.

Instititutions can:
• Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The American Historical Review, 109.1 | The History Cooperative
109.1  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
February, 2004
Previous
Next
The American Historical Review

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Book Review

Methods/Theory



Philip Pomper and David Gary Shaw, editors. The Return of Science: Evolution, History, and Theory. Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield. 2002. Pp. vii, 306. Cloth $75.00, paper $29.95.

Progress and providence once made history seem schematic. In the nineteenth century, dialectic, evolution, and the passion for scientific laws multiplied available schemes. Historians then recoiled from them, impelled by the accumulation of evidence, unpersuaded by all-encompassing descriptions—much less explanations—of how human lives and relationships change. Most of us reject self-designation as scientists, partly because our data are inaccessible to observation or experiment, and partly because we like the particular and unpredictable too much. 1
      Now, however, science exerts enormous magnetism. It commands huge social prestige. It registers triumphs in the struggle to understand the world. People with the science-free schooling endured by my generation can no longer consider themselves well educated—and, if they are historians, rightly so, for humans are embedded in the ecosystems of which they form a part, and no human history is complete without reference to nonhuman nature. So science is back: sharing historians' curricula, influencing our ideas, informing our understanding. . . .

There are about 652 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.