You have not been recognized as a subscriber to the AHR online. About 266 words from this article are provided below; about 518 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the American Historical Association, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time. AHA members can go to the AHA individual membership section to locate their member numbers.

If you are not a member of the American Historical Association, you can:
• Join the AHA and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the American Historical Review.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the American Historical Review (104.3-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the American Historical Review.

Instititutions can:
• Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The American Historical Review, 108.5 | The History Cooperative
108.5  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
December, 2003
Previous
Next
The American Historical Review

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Book Review

Canada and the United States



Ian Dowbiggin. A Merciful End: The Euthanasia Movement in Modern America. New York: Oxford University Press. 2003. Pp. xix, 250. $28.00.

I do not know who gave this book its title, but I doubt it was the author. As Ian Dowbiggin tells the story, providing "a merciful end" for suffering patients is at best a secondary motive of the euthanasia movement in modern America. Instead, he presents evidence of deep Social Darwinian and eugenic currents. Even for those leaders of the movement whose concerns center on the suffering patient rather than on society, Dowbiggin suggests that the fruit of their labor is infected by mistaken judgment and shortsightedness. 1
      Euthanasia has deep roots in Western culture, but Dowbiggin chooses to begin his account at the turn of the last century during the heyday of Social Darwinism and the dawn of eugenics. This choice sets the stage for all that follows. Modernity is largely a product of Darwinism (or vice versa), and Dowbiggin depicts the utilitarian, anticlerical, pervasively Darwinian euthanasia movement as an archetypical manifestation of the modern reform impulse. Fittingly, the movement begins in America with champions like Robert Ingersoll, Felix Adler, William Robinson, Jack London, and Clarence Darrow. America's failure to embrace their arguments for euthanasia even after a century reflects a cultural hesitancy to accept the full implications of modernity, this account suggests. Perhaps there is some sentiment and superstition left in us, at least when we confront death. The rational end for the dying and the defective is euthanasia, its champions argue. . . .

There are about 518 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.