You have not been recognized as a subscriber to the AHR online. About 191 words from this article are provided below; about 552 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the American Historical Association, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time. AHA members can go to the AHA individual membership section to locate their member numbers.

If you are not a member of the American Historical Association, you can:
• Join the AHA and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the American Historical Review.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the American Historical Review (104.3-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the American Historical Review.

Instititutions can:
• Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The American Historical Review, 108.5 | The History Cooperative
108.5  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
December, 2003
Previous
Next
The American Historical Review

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Book Review

Canada and the United States



Jeffrey W. Coker. Confronting American Labor: The New Left Dilemma. Columbia: University of Missouri Press. 2002. Pp. xiv, 211. $32.50.

The difference between the 1960s New Left and the 1930s Old Left, we customarily think, lay most obviously in the new radicals' alienation from the labor movement and their rejection of what C. Wright Mills called "the labor metaphysic": the assumption that labor naturally served as spearhead of the drive toward a new society. Surely, criticism of workers' conservatism (particularly white workers' racism), denunciation of labor leaders' complicity with corporate and political elites, and interest in new non-union sources of protest (in black liberation, women's liberation, and peace movements) were common themes of 1960s radicalism. And as Peter Levy pointed in The New Left and Labor in the 1960s (1994), dislike appeared to be mutual, as construction workers in 1970 assaulted antiwar protesters. Yet Levy demonstrated that such antagonism was far from universal among student or union activists and that the 1960s ended with signs of New Left support for strikes and commitment to join struggles for union and workplace democracy. . . .

There are about 552 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.