You have not been recognized as a subscriber to the AHR online. About 273 words from this article are provided below; about 534 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the American Historical Association, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time. AHA members can go to the AHA individual membership section to locate their member numbers.

If you are not a member of the American Historical Association, you can:
• Join the AHA and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the American Historical Review.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the American Historical Review (104.3-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the American Historical Review.

Instititutions can:
• Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The American Historical Review, 108.3 | The History Cooperative
108.3  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
June, 2003
Previous
Table of Contents
Next
The American Historical Review

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 


Book Review

Asia


Jane E. Elliott. Some Did It for Civilisation, Some Did It for Their Country: A Revised View of the Boxer War. Hong Kong: Chinese University Press; distributed by University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, Mich. 2002. Pp. xliii, 610. $39.00.

     'Some revised views" might be better than "a revised view," since Jane E. Elliott is less interested here in a new interpretation of the war as a whole than in certain of its aspects that she believes have been wrongly assessed. She begins by looking at foreign press coverage, finding the Times of London (whose China stringer, J. O. P. Bland, never bothered to leave Shanghai to observe the fighting) sadly deficient when compared to Harold Harmsworth's Daily Mail or Joseph Pulitzer's World. Yet the Times has conventionally been accepted as an authoritative Western view. Elliott moves on to one of the book's most interesting and original features: examining pictures of the war from both sides. These include Chinese woodblock prints, indebted to folk and literary tradition yet accurately depicting foreign soldiery and military affairs; American photography, valuable for the lessons it learned from the experience of the Civil War; the drawings of bemused artists in papers such as the Illustrated London News, often incapable of envisioning the fighting in China; and the work of foreign cartoonists. In the last two chapters, she shifts her focus away from images to questions of China's military modernization and particularly to the performance of the imperial troops as they met both the Boxers and the Allied troops that, after initial setbacks, fought their way to Beijing. . . .


There are about 534 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.