You have not been recognized as a subscriber to the AHR online. About 183 words from this article are provided below; about 533 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the American Historical Association, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time. AHA members can go to the AHA individual membership section to locate their member numbers.

If you are not a member of the American Historical Association, you can:
• Join the AHA and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the American Historical Review.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the American Historical Review (104.3-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the American Historical Review.

Instititutions can:
• Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The American Historical Review, 108.2 | The History Cooperative
108.2  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
April, 2003
Previous
Table of Contents
Next
The American Historical Review

Table of contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 


Book Review

Methods/Theory


Joseph A. Amato. Rethinking Home: A Case for Writing Local History. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press. 2002. Pp. xvi, 245.

All historians tend to be defensive about the kind of history they write, but none are more likely to fret about it than those whose subject is a self-consciously provincial community. Joseph A. Amato claims that local history "satisfies an innate human desire to be connected to a place. It feeds our hunger to experience life directly and on intimate terms" (p. 4). Yet academic historians rarely take it seriously. "If they bother even to notice local and regional historians, professional historians judge them to be narrowly focused fact gathers and eccentric storytellers, or they are irritated by the disdain that amateur local historians show for the academy's No Trespassing signs." To his credit, Amato sees the problem as a two-way street: the objects of scorn are also the purveyors of scorn. "[L]ocal historians go about their business as oblivious to professional historians and their canons as professional historians are indifferent to them" (p. 9). . . .


There are about 533 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.