You have not been recognized as a subscriber to the AHR online. About 303 words from this article are provided below; about 603 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the American Historical Association, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time. AHA members can go to the AHA individual membership section to locate their member numbers.

If you are not a member of the American Historical Association, you can:
• Join the AHA and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the American Historical Review.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the American Historical Review (104.3-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the American Historical Review.

Instititutions can:
• Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The American Historical Review, 108.2 | The History Cooperative
108.2  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
April, 2003
Previous
Table of Contents
Next
The American Historical Review

Table of contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 


Book Review

Canada and the United States


Nicolas W. Proctor. Bathed in Blood: Hunting and Mastery in the Old South. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia. 2002. Pp. xi, 220. Cloth $45.00, paper $16.50.

Nicolas W. Proctor uses the ubiquitous activity of hunting as a way to understand race, class, and gender in the Old South. Even though most American men hunted, hunting held different meanings for men of different classes, races, ages, and regions. Southern plantation elites, who no longer relied on the provisions resulting from hunting for their families' survival, constructed elaborate rituals and rites concerning hunting activities, appropriate game, and etiquette during the hunt, in the hunting party, and at base camp. These were sportsmen hunters who regarded hunting as a form of leisure and amusement appropriate to their race and class. Sportsmen showed their white, southern, elite manhood by exercising "prowess," "self-control," and "mastery" with their guns, the "talisman of white manhood" (p. 44). 1
     White men of lower status hunted for profit and food. These men, often called pothunters, were the "antithesis of the sportsman." Because they were "intent upon harvesting as much game as possible," using "whatever methods proved most effective and economical" for a wider variety of game (including animals shunned by sportsman like opossum and raccoon), they did not demonstrate those all-important qualities of prowess, self-control, and mastery. Slaves also hunted. Some participated in their masters' hunting expeditions (usually doing very demeaning labors, such as retrieving ducks from ponds). Some masters actually provided particularly skilled slave hunters with guns and set them to the fields to get meat for the master's table. Slaves also hunted for their families in the slave quarters. Often trapping (not using a gun) raccoons, opossum, and rabbits—game that sportsmen shunned—male slave hunters could act as providers for their community. . . .


There are about 603 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.