You have not been recognized as a subscriber to the AHR online. About 249 words from this article are provided below; about 540 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the American Historical Association, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time. AHA members can go to the AHA individual membership section to locate their member numbers.

If you are not a member of the American Historical Association, you can:
• Join the AHA and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the American Historical Review.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the American Historical Review (104.3-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the American Historical Review.

Instititutions can:
• Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The American Historical Review, 108.2 | The History Cooperative
108.2  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
April, 2003
Previous
Table of Contents
Next
The American Historical Review

Table of contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 


Book Review

Asia


Piya Chatterjee. A Time for Tea: Women, Labor, and Post/Colonial Politics on an Indian Plantation. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press. 2001. Pp. xvi, 417. Cloth $69.95, paper $23.95.

Piya Chatterjee's highly readable ethnography is disarmingly crafted with the skills of a canny playwright scripting the tension between the colonial and postcolonial on the backs of women's labor. Each chapter opens with a scene from a play (also called "A Time for Tea") that takes its cues from a number of texts (such as Mahasweta Devi's or Mulk Raj Anand's stories) and borrows from Alice in Wonderland's invitation to fall through a rabbit hole to explore a parallel universe. 1
     This split-screen narrative effect locates the reader simultaneously "in time" and "outside of time" through the construction of parallel texts. And indeed, as one moves from the plantation economy to the sociology of the plantation raj, one does form the impression, in spite of the polyglot peopling of this northeastern border of India, of regional, tribal, class, and caste-specific social worlds that exist side by side in spite of interlocking and interpenetrating work relationships: planters and laborers; memsahibs and adivasi women; Bengalis, Nepalis, and Bhutanese; Santals and Oraons; Lohars, Sonars, and Kumhars all inhabit parallel universes, often unknown to each other through the temporality of social distance. As Chatterjee herself occupies a memsahib position she must own but with which she disidentifies, limits are placed on the knowledge she can acquire about those other worlds. . . .


There are about 540 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.