You have not been recognized as a subscriber to the AHR online. About 270 words from this article are provided below; about 622 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the American Historical Association, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time. AHA members can go to the AHA individual membership section to locate their member numbers.

If you are not a member of the American Historical Association, you can:
• Join the AHA and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the American Historical Review.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the American Historical Review (104.3-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the American Historical Review.

Instititutions can:
• Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The American Historical Review, 108.1 | The History Cooperative
108.1  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
February, 2003
Previous
Table of Contents
Next
The American Historical Review

Table of contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 


Book Review

Methods/Theory



Thomas Bender, editor. Rethinking American History in a Global Age. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press. 2002. Pp. ix, 427. Cloth $55.00, paper $22.50.

From 1997 to 2000, seventy-eight scholars took part in a series of four conferences at New York University's Villa La Pietra in Florence, Italy. Sponsored jointly by NYU and the Organization of American Historians, the Project on Internationalizing the Study of American History sought to promote ways of situating American history in a broader—global—perspective. The sixteen essays in the book under review provide, in the words of editor and project director Thomas Bender, "a selection that collectively and coherently represents the work of the project" (p. viii). Five of the volume's eighteen authors are associated with NYU, seven are located elsewhere in the United States, and six hold appointments at foreign universities. 1
     Although all the authors share the goal of "deprovincializing the narrative of American history" (p. 5), they differ widely in their approach to this goal, and their essays vary in quality and interest as well. Encompassing theoretical pieces on how to escape from over reliance on a national framework for American history, specific reinterpretations of American history in broadened context, and examinations of some of the practical difficulties facing those seeking to promote the internationalizing of American history, these essays give the reader a great deal to ponder. Unfortunately, this interesting information is not always easy to assimilate: although some of the essays are clear and to the point, several display prose that is so dense, jargon-laden, or abstract that untangling it requires multiple readings. . . .


There are about 622 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.