You have not been recognized as a subscriber to the AHR online. About 203 words from this article are provided below; about 578 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the American Historical Association, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time. AHA members can go to the AHA individual membership section to locate their member numbers.

If you are not a member of the American Historical Association, you can:
• Join the AHA and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the American Historical Review.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the American Historical Review (104.3-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the American Historical Review.

Instititutions can:
• Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The American Historical Review, 108.1 | The History Cooperative
108.1  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
February, 2003
Previous
Table of Contents
Next
The American Historical Review

Table of contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 


Book Review

Comparative/World



Tony Ballantyne. Orientalism and Race: Aryanism in the British Empire. (Cambrdige Colonial and Postcolonial Studies.) New York: Palgrave. 2002. Pp. xi, 266. $72.00.

The new history of British imperialism still struggles to overcome certain obstacles. These include a residual metrocentrism and, in reaction, a postcolonial reluctance to transcend the national packaging of history. Another obstacle is that willingness to acknowledge the centrality of racialism in nineteenth-century imperial thought is not always accompanied by a willingness to explore its implications. Finally, the cultural turn, and extreme empirical reactions to it, mean that myth and history are too seldom allowed to influence each other. Tony Ballantyne's study of Aryanism in the British Empire successfully surmounts all four of these obstacles. Beginning with the remarkable philologist William Jones, who learned Sanskrit in less than one year in 1785–1786, Ballantyne traces Aryanism in India, New Zealand, and the British Isles. This may seem an eclectic selection of sites, but the three countries were in fact the centers of British Aryanism. He shows that this was a negotiated and renegotiated product of the colonial encounter, used by Indians and New Zealanders—including indigenous Maori—for their own purposes, as well as by British—and Irish. . . .


There are about 578 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.