You have not been recognized as a subscriber to the AHR online. About 204 words from this article are provided below; about 499 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the American Historical Association, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time. AHA members can go to the AHA individual membership section to locate their member numbers.

If you are not a member of the American Historical Association, you can:
• Join the AHA and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the American Historical Review.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the American Historical Review (104.3-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the American Historical Review.

Instititutions can:
• Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The American Historical Review, 107.5 | The History Cooperative
107.5  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
December, 2002
Previous
Table of Contents
Next
The American Historical Review

Table of contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 


Book Review

Comparative/World



Meredith Baldwin Weddle. Walking in the Way of Peace: Quaker Pacifism in the Seventeenth Century. New York: Oxford University Press. 2001. Pp. xiv, 348. $49.95.

The Quaker commitment to nonviolence was more nuanced and complex, Meredith Baldwin Weddle demonstrates here, than scholars have appreciated. The reigning interpretation holds that in 1660 Quaker leaders framed their peace testimony, the "Declaration," as a defensive response to the Restoration of Stuart monarchy, hoping to forestall further persecution by advertising the Quaker's peaceable intentions and easing the minds of royal officials fearful of sectarian uprisings. But Weddle objects to this interpretation's emphasis on political over religious motivation and collective over individual attitudes and behavior. She finds that Quaker apprehensions about violence preexisted the official 1660 declaration, and she demonstrates that Quakers retained and acted on those sensibilities in the New World under very different social and political circumstances. For Weddle, Quaker nonviolence represented a positive and personal spiritual choice, not a desperate last resort. At the same time, Weddle rejects the naïve assumption that Quakers monolithically adhered to uniform rules of nonviolence, showing instead that Quaker communities and individuals creatively balanced, and often reconciled, their religious principles with military or defensive needs. . . .


There are about 499 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.