You have not been recognized as a subscriber to the AHR online. About 167 words from this article are provided below; about 556 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the American Historical Association, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time. AHA members can go to the AHA individual membership section to locate their member numbers.

If you are not a member of the American Historical Association, you can:
• Join the AHA and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the American Historical Review.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the American Historical Review (104.3-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the American Historical Review.

Instititutions can:
• Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The American Historical Review, 107.5 | The History Cooperative
107.5  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
December, 2002
Previous
Table of Contents
Next
The American Historical Review

Table of contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 


Book Review

Asia



Randall A. Dodgen. Controlling the Dragon: Confucian Engineers and the Yellow River in Late Imperial China. Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press. 2001. Pp. ix, 243. $29.95.

Randall A. Dodgen's book explores the relationships among nature, technology, and political culture in late imperial China. Well researched and filled with judicious analysis, this environmental history examines the ways imperial policy, bureaucratic management, and fiscal realities both altered and were altered by the flood-prone, silt-laden Yellow River of north China. Providing insight into the bureaucratic and geological problems of river conservancy in imperial China, this study argues that, far from discouraging technological innovation and independent thought, Qing rulers welcomed new ideas that were practical and compatible with political realities. Ultimately, imperial management projects failed because the river itself had been altered by successful previous policies into a condition of increased sedimentation and meander activity that could no longer be controlled by the standard bureaucratic solutions of more extensive dikes, locks, spillways, and drainage canals. . . .


There are about 556 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.