You have not been recognized as a subscriber to the AHR online. About 213 words from this article are provided below; about 466 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the American Historical Association, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time. AHA members can go to the AHA individual membership section to locate their member numbers.

If you are not a member of the American Historical Association, you can:
• Join the AHA and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the American Historical Review.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the American Historical Review (104.3-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the American Historical Review.

Instititutions can:
• Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The American Historical Review, 107.5 | The History Cooperative
107.5  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
December, 2002
Previous
Table of Contents
Next
The American Historical Review

Table of contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 


Book Review

Comparative/World



Jonathan S. McMurray. Distant Ties: Germany, the Ottoman Empire, and the Construction of the Baghdad Railway. Westport, Conn.: Praeger. 2001. Pp. x, 155. $64.00.

Within the tight bounds of barely one hundred pages of text, this monograph attempts to untangle the complexities surrounding the construction of what has traditionally been called the Berlin-Baghdad Railway. In some respects, Jonathan S. McMurray does a competent job by making good use of unpublished German documents, personal memoirs, and travel accounts. But his task is hugely complicated by the necessity of dealing simultaneously with four different scenarios, which he does with wavering dexterity. 1
     First, diplomacy. An incredible amount of scholarly toil has been invested in an effort to analyze the involvement of the Ottoman Empire in European affairs. Apart from Germany's infamous Weltpolitik under Wilhelm II, there were English designs to protect claims in the Persian Gulf, French banking interests, Russia's drive to penetrate the Dardanelles, a war with Italy, several Balkan conflicts, the guerrilla campaign by Lawrence of Arabia, and so on. McMurray tries gamely to unfurl this gigantic backdrop, but its intrinsic confusion is all too well reflected in his fitful rendition. The explanatory value of Ulrich Trumpener's Germany and the Ottoman Empire, 1914–1918 (1968) thus remains intact. . . .


There are about 466 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.