You have not been recognized as a subscriber to the AHR online. About 339 words from this article are provided below; about 730 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the American Historical Association, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time. AHA members can go to the AHA individual membership section to locate their member numbers.

If you are not a member of the American Historical Association, you can:
• Join the AHA and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the American Historical Review.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the American Historical Review (104.3-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the American Historical Review.

Instititutions can:
• Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The American Historical Review, 107.5 | The History Cooperative
107.5  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
December, 2002
Previous
Table of Contents
Next
The American Historical Review

Table of contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 


Book Review

Methods/Theory



Ronald Inden, Jonathan Walters, and Daud Ali. Querying the Medieval: Texts and the History of Practices in South Asia. New York: Oxford University Press. 2000. Pp. 235. $45.00.

The "classical" and "medieval" texts of South Asia—Buddhist, Hindu, and Jain—seem somehow so authoritative, so carefully edited and translated to produce a "pure" text as close to the "original" as possible, purged of later interpolations. These texts, in hefty bound sets, have been presented as South Asia's contribution to the wisdom of the world. The texts have, as presented, been unsatisfactory to historians; they float in a timeless never-never land without context, history, politics, or power, thereby avoiding basic questions. Who wrote them: where, when, why? Who was the patron, and who was the audience? What were the reasons for their production? How do they differ in viewpoint from others of their type, and what do those changes suggest about changes in society? At best, these texts have been attributed to the genius of a single author or—lacking a plausible author—to the impetus of a larger concept such as "Hindu society" or "Aryan sensibility" or "medieval spirituality." 1
     The issues surrounding the "timeless" presentation of South Asian "classical" or "medieval" texts are major. They have generally been presented as typical of a "medieval" mentality or spirituality that separates previous centuries from colonial and current ones. In this now-dominant formulation, all earlier centuries are rendered functionally "dead" and inconsequential. Only the colonial centuries matter for the present. 2
     In the past fifteen years, several scholars began rethinking both uses of the texts and methods for analyzing them. Thomas R. Trautmann studied the eighteenth and nineteenth-century politics of the "discovery" of the texts by the British colonial government. Paula Richmond has called into question an "authoritative" text and shown that many different Ramayanas are valid and valued among different audiences. Cynthia Talbot examined South Indian inscriptions for patterns of power. Ronald Inden produced a broad-brush critique of standard Indian textual studies in Imagining India (2000). . . .


There are about 730 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.