You have not been recognized as a subscriber to the AHR online. About 293 words from this article are provided below; about 529 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the American Historical Association, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time. AHA members can go to the AHA individual membership section to locate their member numbers.

If you are not a member of the American Historical Association, you can:
• Join the AHA and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the American Historical Review.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the American Historical Review (104.3-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the American Historical Review.

Instititutions can:
• Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The American Historical Review, 107.3 | The History Cooperative
107.3  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
June, 2002
Previous
Table of Contents
Next
The American Historical Review

Table of contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 


Book Review

Comparative/World


Eric Mumford. The CIAM Discourse on Urbanism, 1928–1960. Cambridge: MIT Press. 2000. pp. xv, 375. $45.00.

Eric Mumford has written a detailed, richly illustrated history of the Congres Internationaux d'Architecture Moderne (International Congresses of Modern Architecture, or CIAM). CIAM was the name both of a series of meetings of self-proclaimed "modern architects" and of an organization that planned those meetings and promoted the views of its leading members. The organization was founded in Switzerland in 1928 and dissolved in the Netherlands in 1959. It was always dominated by Western Europeans and their concerns, although it included members from all corners of Europe. It became more truly international during and after World War II. 1
     The picture that emerges from this book shows that CIAM was never a monolithic organization with a single purpose. The architects and planners who founded CIAM in 1928 shared a desire to promote modern solutions to the challenges of urban life. They saw themselves as members of an avant garde, who could work together in spite of their artistic and political differences. However, their apparent unity ebbed considerably within five years, which, ironically, is the very time at which CIAM's best-known programmatic statements were being formulated and publicized. In its later years, it was described by one of its members, P. A. Emery, as an "intellectual drugstore . . . where each person finds what he has come to seek" (p. 228). Some of the "drugstore" quality can be applied to CIAM even at its inception, when French and German-language versions of resolutions used different concepts that reflected different outlooks of French and German-speaking members (p. 25). Similarly, there were two alternate authoritative versions of the conclusions reached at the famous congress of 1933 (pp. 86–87). . . .


There are about 529 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.