You have not been recognized as a subscriber to the AHR online. About 288 words from this article are provided below; about 538 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the American Historical Association, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time. AHA members can go to the AHA individual membership section to locate their member numbers.

If you are not a member of the American Historical Association, you can:
• Join the AHA and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the American Historical Review.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the American Historical Review (104.3-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the American Historical Review.

Instititutions can:
• Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The American Historical Review, 107.3 | The History Cooperative
107.3  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
June, 2002
Previous
Table of Contents
Next
The American Historical Review

Table of contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 


Book Review

Canada and the United States


Martin Crawford. Ashe County's Civil War: Community and Society in the Appalachian South. (A Nation Divided: New Studies in Civil War History.) Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia. 2001. Pp. xiv, 238. Cloth $49.50, paper $17.50.

Martin Crawford's very valuable book uses an intimate knowledge of Ashe County's agricultural society to illuminate the impact of the war. Living in the far northwest corner of Appalachian North Carolina, Ashe's people, Crawford argues, were nevertheless shaped by American values and institutions—political and economic—as much as they were by local conditions. Relative isolation may have encouraged family and neighborhood-based subsistence farming, but it did not preclude involvement in markets and politics. More particularly, as demographic pressures on farmland in the 1850s limited opportunity, the urge toward self-sufficiency gave settlers two choices: migrate or commit to more commercial farm production. Social distance increased, and town merchants and lawyers gained influence. Likewise, Ashe males enthusiastically participated in a partisan politics rooted in family and kin group loyalties but cognizant of Whig and Democratic ideology, and therefore were current with the crises of the 1850s. Political leaders, largely drawn from firstcomer, large landowning families, were likely to be slaveholders, raising wheat and tobacco for eastern markets, so the politics of slavery and the concerns of tidewater Carolina resonated in Ashe. When war threatened, Ashe, like much of the Upland South, embraced conditional Unionism; when Abraham Lincoln called for troops to put down insurrection, Ashe joined the stampede to the Confederacy. But importantly, again as in much of the Appalachian South, people and sections most oriented to markets outside the mountains were Confederate loyalists, while poorer areas still mostly subsistence oriented were, at first quietly, Unionist. . . .


There are about 538 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.